Is Corona More Dangerous Than Influenza A?

Check out the documentation on Netflix about Corona!

Are you looking at! (I would call 30x the mortality rate "more dangerous"!)

Covid 19 is more dangerous because it can be transmitted much faster and we still don't know enough about this virus, there's currently no medication and no vaccination against Covid 19.

If the state and the media say it's dangerous, it is…

Dangerous is dangerous… No matter what it is when it endangers me, my health, my well-being and possibly my life

I don't look at anything to weigh it up.

I was already so sick, thank you very much… I don't have to experience that again (intensive care unit etc.) … No matter why, sick is sick and that is NOT nice, believe me. And who thinks you are fit afterwards… Yes, it takes VERY LONG time for skin, hair, all organs etc. To be "normal" again… So people, take care of yourself and become tempted and bored (it IS corrosive to Time, for everyone!) Please don't be reckless. Believe me, YOU DON'T WANT TO EXPERIENCE IT!

Ok, according to your statistics, is Influenza A (H5N1) clearly ahead of Covid19?

There he is again with his extrapolated estimates.

in germany and italy alone, no distinction is made between AN and MIT corona. The calculated number of deaths therefore says nothing at all.
dr streeck got 0.37% (exactly as much as with the influenza flu 2017/2018)
2 American virologists got an even lower score with the same procedure with 5200 people. (for the usa) in some states i think there was even talk of 0.08%.
"dr erickson covid19 briefing" is the name of the video. But of course it was deleted directly from youtube. Which says everything again.

You contradict yourself in your comment.
and just because it spreads faster doesn't automatically mean it's more dangerous.
if it is as dangerous as a normal flu, it is actually even more harmless, because the faster spread of the herd immunity builds up faster.
we do not know how many people have died of it so far, because in Germany there's no distinction between AN and MIT corona.
however, one can say that there are currently 160,000 infected cases and 120,000 of them have already recovered.

What are you talking about? Your case has nothing to do with this.
Your scaremongering is of no use to anyone.
we're talking about corona and not cancer, which is combated with a ner chemo.

Was uploaded somewhere else:

Yes, there's a drug called "Remdesivir" against this virus that has already freed many people who were even in critical condition from the virus so that they could go home within a week. https://www.noz.de/deutschland-welt/gut-zu-wissen/artikel/2038155/behandlungserfolge-mit-remdesivir-gegen-covid-19-bei-affen Unfortunately, the drug has not yet been approved in Germany.

a combination of medicines against the HIV & flu viruses is said to have eliminated the virus in the sick.

A mass vaccination against the sars-cov-2 virus could actually begin in two weeks with a so-called "dead vaccine", whereby infectious parts of the virus are no longer injected under the skin to immunize people, there's already one approved clinical study, Prof. Dr. Drosten reports in the interview >>

Influenza A is not a single virus, but a group of viruses. The danger can only be stated in relation to a single virus, since these are very different. A number of factors play a role in the danger:

Lethality in relation to the infected.
The reproduction rate
The possible countermeasures such as vaccines or medication.

In germany and italy alone, no distinction is made between AN and MIT corona.

The number of AN Corona deaths can only be estimated statistically and only after a few months.

H5N1 is "normal flu, sure"?

Influenza A = H5N1 = bird flu. Just for info.