What do you think of pre-astronautics?

Pre-astronautics in short expresses the presence of extraterrestrial life from past life. So aliens that have lived on our planet before.

If you deal with it a little, you don't immediately distance yourself and say: No, extraterrestrial life does not exist, but many things become clear to you. On Netflix I can recommend the documentary "Ancient Aliens" to you.

Well I don't think that's sooo absurd. I think most people will accept that there's a high probability that there's extraterrestrial life somewhere in the universe. If you're not fundamentally religious now.

But I see two serious problems in theory:

archaeological evidence of extraterrestrial life. If we assume that the living things are based on carbon, you have to find something that does not fit a living thing in our evolutionary chain.
if a globally traveling people has existed for centuries and they have already been on earth, I can't imagine why they have not contacted people in the past 200 years

I find your comment interesting because pre-astronautics describes exactly your first point with evolution: It assumes that we humans are not related to the monkeys but much more to extraterrestrials that created evolution itself. Sounds crazy, but is understandable when considered. On the second point, the extraterrestrials should have existed for billions of years and then disappeared again.

I found Erich von Däniken quite entertaining in the past and got my first book ("Memories of the Future") as well as a few others. His television show was also entertaining.

From my point of view, pre-astronautics can't be taken seriously scientifically, since practically all "clues", such as the Abydos hieroglyphs ("helicopters" or "tanks"), can also be explained conventionally without aliens.

Yes, I find the hieroglyphics particularly exciting!

"What do you think of pre-astronautics?" NOTHING!

Why should the aliens have made themselves comfortable here? There's also the myth that the aliens are said to have penetrated earth women. Did you know about sexual reproduction? Perhaps reproduction worked quite differently for them.
Funny, but not to be taken seriously.
And why should aliens come to Earth? How did you find out?
Oxygen is a cell poison. And should our visitors just have survived that?
Was it carbon units at all, were they mammals? Why not blue slime monsters?
Combining all amino acids, not just the 20 essential ones, gives more options than there are stars in the Milky Way. And then aliens are said to have happened to look like us? May be, but need not be.

Even on these few points, none of the pre-astronautics fans have a reasonable, logically understandable and scientifically sound explanation.

But as I said, everything is funny and good, to give something cheerful winter days.

However, all of the points described are no more meaningful than those of the pre-astronaut. Every being knows reproduction because otherwise it would not be viable, who knows why they became aware of us? Maybe because there was an intergalactic war (sci-fi) and maybe we're descended from the extraterrestrials and so they could very well breathe oxygen (every living being can do this because O2 is not 100% molecularly bound in our atmosphere).

There are a lot of artefacts that speak for it, but almost all of them are so puzzling that they still can't be explained credibly and judged correctly. - Sleight of hand! If the aliens were really here, they needed advanced technology to bridge the immense distances.

With the knowledge and technical capabilities that we have today, it is absolutely impossible to undertake such space travel. Therefore, at the current level of science and technology, we can't imagine how these aliens got here.

All fantasies are pure science fiction and completely abstruse. Science is correspondingly negative. In addition, the clever scientists do not want to admit that many things can't be explained at all, e.g. The phenomenon of crop circles.

In this respect, pre-astronautics is a matter of faith. There are enough esotericists and "eyewitnesses" who fully confirm the phenomenon and take alleged "spiritual journeys" to distant cosmic worlds. You are welcome to sift through such materials and get an idea of it yourself and decide whether you believe it or are even convinced that you are dealing with factual reports.

The usual opinions of the scientific community are of course condescending and devastating: Which clever mind would like to admit that he can't explain something or that there are things that exact science has no access to?

An exception to this rule is e.g. Illobrand by Ludwiger. If you are interested, have fun!

What a great answer!

Thanks for all the facts, I'll watch the video.

I say ma so it's an alternative theory. It is possible.

The second point explains the UFO phenomenon, but we still don't know why they don't show up, maybe they noticed at the time that we need more development time and therefore don't want direct contact 🤔

That is an approach.

I've seen UFOs before.

If you assume that we're descended from aliens, just like all of your points are void

Really? Unfortunately not yet.

On the first point:
Even if that were the case, anomalies would still have to be found. Apart from aliens, they are very close to our fauna at that time. This would also coincide with the religion that God created humans (and ALiens) in his image. I also wrote problems and not contradictions ^^

to the second point. I don't understand your argument. It doesn't have to be whether it has existed for so long. It is probably because a certain evolutionary time is necessary before a people can travel through space, but so be it.

I only find it questionable why they were once on earth and turned their backs on them. After all, they populated this one. If we start from the same motivational theories as humans, then such behavior makes little sense

Well, that would of course be an idea. Unlikely but not impossible. Just think to me if you have already had contact with us humans, why not again? We didn't make a big leap, but we made it big enough.

In addition, NASA and other organizations have enough projects to show aliens the willingness to contact them. Then why shouldn't they?

I don't know, maybe our governments didn't want that and have banned the aliens, I'm looking for this solution. And let me put it this way: Your Jesus was crucified, maybe they didn't think so well and are now more of a distance ^^

Hoho very wicked thought. But I find it interesting. Well you can't deny the human species hasn't really done much to show others jo come talk to us.

I don't think much of such theories. The problem with conspiracy hoeries is that a lot of people really have to keep them shut. And history shows that people are not so good at it. I believe in censorship and that information is deliberately not given to us, but what is so big? I think it's unlikely.

haha is fun to talk about. God it was a long time ago. I miss nerd friends. I need some again

Yes, if you assume that, can you do it unchecked? Does this opinion stand up to a fact-based review? After all, an assertion is not proof! Every mathematician, scientist and lawyer can confirm that.

And as I explained, there's no reason to assume that aliens "work" or have worked as we have.

Gravity, sunlight, atmosphere, air pressure, bacteria, viruses. Aliens are said to have just survived all of this and then nibbled cute Playmates? That seems a bit far-fetched to me.

But if you could submit studies from different research institutions around the world or a statement from the UN, it would be helpful.

What are nerd friends? 😂

Preastronautics could be an exciting topic in and of itself. Unfortunately, since its inception, it has been taken over by various spinners who predominantly pursue commercial interests and do not adhere to the valid forms of scientific publication when presenting their "theses". On the other hand, as a pseudoscience, it never had the right to formality and verification.

An assumption has nothing to do with checked…